Product
Solutions
Pricing
Resources
Company
Legal
Sign in
REQUEST A DEMO GET STARTED
For law firms

Partners practice law. Cloop handles everything before that.

Senior partners spend six hours a week qualifying inquiries instead of practicing law. Cloop reads the conversation, matches the right partner by practice and regulatory area, triages urgency, and delivers a briefing-ready meeting. Partners arrive to substance, not introductions.

In one sentence

Cloop screens inbound inquiries before they reach your partners. It qualifies, matches the right partner, and delivers briefing-ready meetings, so partners only see work that fits.

Practice-area routing · Urgency triage · Regulatory-aware

The partner economics

Every partner hour has a price. Most firms pay twice.

Partners bill hourly but absorb qualification cost, qualifying non-fits, triaging urgency by hand, doing the first 15 minutes of discovery that should happen before the meeting. The invoice shows billable work. The calendar shows a different story.

  • 01

    Partners bill in six-minute blocks

    Senior partners run €300/hour and up. Time gets tracked to the tenth of an hour. Anything not billable is a cost the firm absorbs, usually without measuring it. That includes the work of figuring out who you are and whether you need a lawyer at all.

  • 02

    Wrong partner kills the engagement

    A GDPR question lands with a contract-law partner. An M&A inquiry routes to the dispute team. A whistleblower call reaches a junior associate who bills €180/hour. Every misroute is wasted partner time and a client who feels passed around.

  • 03

    Partners shouldn't qualify inquiries

    The skills that make a senior employment-law partner brilliant are not the skills of inquiry triage. Forcing them to do both means under-delivering on both: billing less, and qualifying less thoroughly than a dedicated process would.

The billable hour calculation A stepwise equation building across six moments, 6 hours per week, times 300 euros per hour, times 50 weeks, equals 90 000 euros per partner per year, times 5 partners, equals 450 000 euros per year. Below: across a five-year horizon, 2.25 million euros. A caption reads this is the cost of not automating qualification. HOURS / WEEK 6 h × € / HOUR €300 × WEEKS / YR 50 = PER PARTNER / YEAR €90,000 × PARTNERS 5 5 PARTNERS · PER YEAR €450,000 5-YEAR HORIZON €2.25M This is the cost of not automating qualification.
The weekly loss

per partner, per week, on qualification that isn't billable

Six hours × €300/hour × 50 working weeks = €90,000 per partner per year. For a 5-partner firm, that's €450,000 annually turning into "we're not a fit" calls. That's the cost of not automating qualification.

Partner-led

The right partner. The right brief. Every time.

Six shifts in how qualification works when the partner is the scarce resource. Each one protects billable hours while improving engagement fit.

Partner matching dashboard, qualified inquiry queue, partner utilization, filtered self-serve A browser at cloop.io/law-dashboard titled Inbound Queue, Employment Practice. Top row: 47 inquiries, 12 qualified, 35 filtered out. Main area has three columns, qualified inquiry queue with five matched partners and confidence percentages, partner utilization with five utilization bars in deep wine, and a filtered-out list of four self-serve resolutions. Bottom bar shows 12,400 euros of billable capacity protected this week. cloop.io/law-dashboard Inbound Queue · Employment Practice · This Week INQUIRIES · THIS WEEK 47 QUALIFIED FOR PARTNERS 12 FILTERED · SELF-SERVE 35 Qualified inquiry queue Partner utilization Filtered · self-serve Polaris Logistics · Termination dispute → Helena Rantanen · Employment law URG 94% Aurora Energy · DORA implementation → Markus Saari · Fintech regulatory STD 91% Stellar Pharma · Trademark dispute → Anna Kovács · IPR litigation 4 WEEKS 88% Northstar Capital · SPA review → Olli Lehto · M&A STD 87% ConsumerCo Group · NIS2 readiness → Riku Mäki · Cybersecurity APPROACH 85% Helena Rantanen Employment law 78% Markus Saari Fintech regulatory 82% Anna Kovács IPR litigation 91% Olli Lehto M&A 67% available Riku Mäki Cybersecurity 73% General employment FAQ → sent to FAQ guide Small-business contract → template library Family-law inquiry → not a fit (corporate only) Basic GDPR question → data-protection FAQ RESOLVED 35 no partner time used LIVE · €12,400 billable capacity protected this week
  1. 01
    Partner matching by practice area

    A termination dispute routes to your employment-law partner. A shareholder agreement reaches corporate. A trademark filing reaches IPR. Cloop maps inquiries to your firm's partner coverage automatically, by practice area, region, and company type.

  2. 02
    Urgency triage before the calendar opens

    An immediate termination dispute needs an employment partner this week. An annual policy review can wait three weeks. Cloop distinguishes urgency from non-urgency in the conversation and calendars accordingly. Urgent capacity stays protected.

  3. 03
    Scope qualification before the call

    One-off advice, ongoing retainer, or complex project: each needs different partner time and a different price. Cloop qualifies scope at qualification so the partner knows what kind of engagement is on the table before the meeting starts. No more €5,000 retainer pitches to clients who wanted a 30-minute call.

  4. 04
    Partner briefing before the meeting

    When the meeting books, the partner opens the calendar and finds: company context, stated legal issue, urgency, regulatory area if relevant, budget signals, timeline, and whether the firm is already a retainer client. First-call discovery is done. Partner time starts producing value at minute one.

  5. 05
    Regulatory routing without the hand-offs

    A DORA inquiry routes to the fintech-regulatory partner. A NIS2 question reaches cybersecurity counsel. EU AI Act goes to tech regulation. GDPR to the data-protection lead. Whistleblower Directive to employment-and-compliance. No more "let me put you in touch with my colleague" calls.

  6. 06
    Strategic intelligence on practice demand

    Firm leadership sees which practices are most asked about, which areas are under-utilized, which compliance domains are pulling the most inquiries, which competing firms keep showing up. Practice-portfolio decisions stop being partner gut-feel.

One AI, five agents

Orchestrated for the law-firm qualification cycle.

Cloop orchestrates five specialized AI agents across the law-firm engagement journey, from first inquiry to signed retainer. Each agent activates at the right moment, protecting partner time and routing correctly.

  1. AGENT 01 Welcome agent

    Recognizes the firm making the inquiry, picks up the practice-area signal from the conversation, greets with context.

  2. AGENT 02 Sales agent

    Qualifies by practice. Employment law needs different questions than M&A or IPR. The agent matches depth and tone to the work.

  3. AGENT 03 Booking agent

    Routes to the right partner by practice, industry, urgency, and regulatory area. Protects partner calendars from misrouted leads.

  4. AGENT 04 Customer Care agent

    Recognizes existing retainer clients exploring other practices. A current employment client asking about IPR is a cross-practice signal worth catching.

  5. AGENT 05 Follow-up agent

    Keeps warm prospects engaged across the typical 2 to 8 week consideration cycle. Pauses the second the prospect re-engages.

Partners handle the matter. Cloop handles everything before and after.

In practice

Four law-firm scenarios where Cloop fits.

These are illustrative scenarios, not specific customer cases. They represent the real patterns Cloop is built for in law-firm qualification.

Partner matching flow, practice area, specialization, and urgency converge on one partner From a Termination dispute inquiry at the top, Cloop branches into three routing dimensions: practice area (Employment, Contract, Corporate, Dispute resolution, M&A, IPR, with Employment highlighted); specialization (Termination, Discrimination, Whistleblower, Restructuring, Compensation, Collective bargaining, with Termination highlighted); and urgency (Immediate, This week, This month, Flexible, with Immediate highlighted). The three highlighted branches converge into a matched partner node labelled Employment law partner. The outcome line reads meeting booked, brief delivered, partner time protected. INQUIRY ARRIVES Termination dispute · Mid-cap shipping · Urgent PRACTICE AREA • Employment • Contract • Corporate • Dispute resolution • M&A • IPR SPECIALIZATION • Termination • Discrimination • Whistleblower • Restructuring • Compensation • Collective bargaining URGENCY • Immediate • This week • This month • Flexible MATCHED PARTNER Employment law partner · Urgent queue illustrative match, not a real partner Meeting booked · Brief delivered · Partner time protected
  1. Employment law · urgency triage Termination dispute on Monday. Annual review in March. Same qualification.

    A mid-cap shipping firm calls about an immediate termination dispute. A multinational manufacturer wants to schedule its annual employment-policy review. Both inquiries hit the same form. Without context, partners take the urgent one too late and the routine one too early. Cloop reads the conversation, flags "immediate termination dispute" to the urgent queue with a same-week slot, and books the policy review with the senior partner three weeks out. Urgent capacity stays protected.

  2. M&A · scope qualification Multi-day due diligence vs. share-purchase-agreement review.

    A growth-stage SaaS founder is selling. A holding company wants a pre-merger antitrust read. A family business owner wants help with a generational transfer. All three sound like "M&A." Different partners, different deal sizes, different scope. Cloop qualifies at qualification: deal type, target size, stage of negotiation, jurisdictional complexity. The senior M&A partner sees a brief that already names the deal pattern. The first conversation starts at strategy, not introductions.

  3. Regulatory · DORA fintech DORA implementation deadline. Wrong partner kills the engagement.

    A Nordic fintech approaches the firm about DORA operational-resilience compliance. Without specialized routing, the inquiry lands with whichever partner is on triage rotation. Half the time that's a generalist who needs to read up on DORA before the first call. Cloop reads the regulatory signal at qualification and routes directly to the fintech-regulatory partner who has done two DORA implementations this year. The client never has to repeat the question.

  4. IPR · dispute Trademark dispute lands with the contract team. Again.

    A consumer brand discovers a competitor using a confusingly similar mark. They send a contact-form inquiry that reads 'we have a trademark issue with a competitor.' Through a generic form, this goes to the contract-law team because there's no IPR option. Cloop reads it as 'IPR + dispute' and routes to the IPR litigation lead with a brief that names the marks, the competitor, and the urgency. The client gets a substantive response in hours, not after a hand-off chain.

Strategic intelligence

What your market is actually asking.

Beyond protecting partner hours, Cloop gives firm leadership the data to make practice-portfolio decisions. Which practices are in demand. Which partners are under-booked. Which regulations are driving the most inquiries. Which firms are being compared against yours.

  1. WHICH PRACTICES
    are most asked about this quarter
  2. WHICH PARTNERS
    are under-booked
  3. WHICH REGULATIONS
    are pulling the most inquiries
  4. WHICH FIRMS
    your prospects are also evaluating
  5. WHICH CLIENT TYPES
    need which partners

Practice-portfolio decisions, validated by inquiry data, not partner intuition.

How Cloop fits

Where Cloop fits in a partner-led law firm.

Cloop screens inbound inquiries and protects partner time for billable work. Partners still own every matter: the analysis, the advocacy, the client relationship. Cloop just makes sure they only engage when the fit is real and the briefing is complete.

At Nordic partner rates, Cloop pays back its annual cost in under two weeks of reclaimed billable hours.

See pricing

Try it yourself

See Cloop on your actual law-firm site.

Thirty minutes. We'll walk through partner matching, urgency triage, and regulatory routing, on your actual website and practice mix.